简介：the internet is profoundly changing how scientists work and publish. new business models are being tested by publishers, including open access, in which the author pays and content is free to the user. this ongoing web focus will explore current trends and future possibilities. each week, the website will publish specially commissioned insights and analysis from leading scientists, librarians, publishers and other stakeholders, as well as key links, and articles from our archive. all content is available fr

原站：http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/

“Nature Web Focus: Access to the literature: the deba”的内容更新

累计：29 篇（自 2007-05-21 起）

更新：约6篇/年，最后更新1733 天前

Nature Web Focus: Access to the literature: the debate continues

Britain decides 'open access' is still an open issue

Can journals function if authors, instead of readers, carry the cost of publication? An inquiry by the UK House of Commons Science and Technology Committee concluded this week that we will just have to wait and see. After five months of investigating access to journals in science, technology and medicine, the committee has reported that the concept of 'a... (314 天前)

http://inezha.com/w/5u2olve

Nature Web Focus: Access to the literature: the debate continues

The best business model for scholarly journals: an e

The answer to the question 'What is the best business model for scholarly journals?' depends on who is asking. In this article, we first characterize the views of some of the major players in the market (for-profit publishers, non-profit publishers, libraries) on which business model is best. We will consider the two commonly discussed business models, t... (314 天前)

http://inezha.com/w/4xjy5vj

Nature Web Focus: Access to the literature: the debate continues

A professional society's take on access to the scien

The Journal of Biological Chemistry (JBC), the flagship journal of the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB), will celebrate its centennial in 2005. The JBC predated the ASBMB by one year. This is notable in that a professional scientific society grew out of the need for a discipline-oriented scientific publication. The expertis... (314 天前)

http://inezha.com/w/c8uziuv

Nature Web Focus: Access to the literature: the debate continues

An evidence-based assessment of the 'author pays' mo

Much discussion of author payments as a means to Open Access lacks consideration of evidence on their potential impact on the scholarly journal system. Our recent work perhaps sheds new light on both favourable and unfavourable aspects of this option.... (314 天前)

http://inezha.com/w/1r1m1us

Nature Web Focus: Access to the literature: the debate continues

PNAS and Open Access

As I announced in a recent Editorial, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA (PNAS) has begun an Open Access (OA) option, whereby authors may pay a surcharge of US$1,000 to make their paper freely available on the PNAS and PubMed Central (PMC) websites immediately upon publication. The experiment will run until 31 December 2005. The PNAS... (314 天前)

http://inezha.com/w/pi667uq

Nature Web Focus: Access to the literature: the debate continues

The primacy of authors in achieving Open Access

Of all the groups that want OA to scientific and scholarly research literature, only one is in a position to deliver it: authors. It is authors who decide whether to submit their work to OA journals, to deposit their work in OA archives, or to transfer copyright.... (314 天前)

http://inezha.com/w/3a5k6uy

Nature Web Focus: Access to the literature: the debate continues

Not so quiet on a Western front

In negotiations with Reed Elsevier, the University of California libraries recently held out over a license to selected titles in its Science Direct package until a price was agreed that allowed, at least temporarily, the arrest of the spectacular inflation in price over the past few years. This experience has been illuminating to me as a university admi... (314 天前)

http://inezha.com/w/6s10lup

订阅者 ( 2 )

相关订阅源